Confused...SA Account

Hi
I have a two node cluster with SQL2000 SP3. When the node1 fails over to
node2, the SQL Server Agent fails. The log file says "Login Failed for user
'sa'" I don't understand how the SA account can fail on node2 and not on
node1. Can anyone shed some light on this and possibly how to resolve the
issue.
Thank You
Marc
What security account context is the SQL Agent running under? Is it a domain account and does it have adequate permissions/rights on both nodes?
|||Hi Stephen
SQL security is set for "SQL Server and Windows" and the service account is
in the Domain Admins group. Same service account is used for both nodes.
Regards
Marc
"Stephen Strong" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:39A963C4-A818-487F-8B10-C38CC58715FA@.microsoft.com...
> What security account context is the SQL Agent running under? Is it a
domain account and does it have adequate permissions/rights on both nodes?
|||Is the SQL Server Agent startup account a member of the local admin group
on both nodes. If you are using SQL Server authentication for SQL Server
Agent to connect to SQL Server then the SQL Server Agent startup account
has to be a local Admin.
You can check the SQL Agent connection properties by right clicking on SQL
Server Agent - Properties - Connection and see how the connection to SQL
Server is set up.
Rand
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
|||Thanks Guys
As it turns out, one of our programmers changed the authentication method to
Windows rather than SQL. I changed it back and all is well.
Regards
Marc
"Marc" <Marc@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:%23u4AZPJJEHA.2736@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> I have a two node cluster with SQL2000 SP3. When the node1 fails over to
> node2, the SQL Server Agent fails. The log file says "Login Failed for
user
> 'sa'" I don't understand how the SA account can fail on node2 and not on
> node1. Can anyone shed some light on this and possibly how to resolve the
> issue.
> Thank You
> Marc
>

configuring Active/Active...

My Current configuration is:
Windows 2003, cluster service, SQL 2000 sp3
I have 3 databases I want to run one in the cluster node1 and the other two
databases in the node2.
So, when node1 fail, node2 take the node1 DB and vice-versa.
Is possible? do you know some URL where I can find information about it?
Another question: In the Active/Active my applications always make a
connection to the Virtual Server or to each Instance?
Thanks
AA
Yes, this is possible. You will need separate physical disks for each
installation of SQL. Each instance corresponds to a virtual server so the
SQL connection is to the IP of the virtual server and the port of the
instance. Since each instance is on a separate IP address, you can have all
instances using the same port number. All that is required to create a
second installation is to run the SQL install agaon and create a new
clustered instance using new resources (disks, network name, IP address).
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com
I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org
"AA" <aa@.personal.net.py> wrote in message
news:e93uK5UdEHA.3732@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> My Current configuration is:
> Windows 2003, cluster service, SQL 2000 sp3
> I have 3 databases I want to run one in the cluster node1 and the other
two
> databases in the node2.
> So, when node1 fail, node2 take the node1 DB and vice-versa.
> Is possible? do you know some URL where I can find information about it?
>
> Another question: In the Active/Active my applications always make a
> connection to the Virtual Server or to each Instance?
>
> Thanks
> AA
>